The Supreme Court of India (“SC”) has in its judgment dated October 28, 2021 (“Judgement”), in the matter of Sripati Singh (since deceased) through his son Gaurav Singh v. The State of Jharkhand and Another [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1269-1270 Of 2021], held that the dishonour of a cheque which is issued as a security can […]
Category : Between The Lines
Between the Lines | Karnataka High Court: An application for compounding under Section 15 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 cannot be rejected on the basis of Rule 11 of Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2000
The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court (“KHC”) in the matter of Mrs. Joyce Lynn Peters v. Reserve Bank Of India and others (Writ Petition No. 26425 of 2017) (“Judgement”), held that an application for compounding under Section 15 (Power to compound contravention) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (“FEMA”) cannot be rejected on the basis […]
Between the Lines | Supreme Court: NCLT cannot adjudicate contractual dispute if termination of contract is based on grounds unrelated to Corporate Debtor’s insolvency
The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) has in its judgement dated November 23, 2021, in the matter of TATA Consultancy Services Limited v. Vishal Ghisulal Jain, Resolution Professional, SK Wheels Private Limited [ Civil Appeal No 3045 of 2020] held that, the residuary jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”) cannot be invoked if the […]
Between the Lines | Supreme Court: Limitation period for appeal under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 begins from the date of pronouncement of order and delay in uploading the order cannot exclude limitation
The Supreme Court (“SC”) has in its judgment dated October 22, 2021 (“Judgement”), in the matter V Nagarajan v. SKS Ispat and Power Limited and Others [Civil Appeal No. 3327 of 2020], held that the period of limitation for filing of appeal against an order as per Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, […]
Between the Lines | Supreme Court: Chairman, directors, and other key managerial personnel of a company cannot be automatically held vicariously liable for the offences committed by a company
The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) in Ravindranatha Bajpe v. Mangalore Special Economic Zone Limited and Others (decided on September 27, 2021), held that the chairman, directors, and other key managerial personnel of a company cannot be automatically held vicariously liable for the offences committed by a company unless specific allegations and averments against them are […]
Between the Lines | NCLAT: Security Deposit and the interest thereon would fall within the ambit of the definition of ‘Financial Debt’ under the IBC
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi (“NCLAT”) has in its judgment dated October 07, 2021 (“Judgement”), in the matter of Sach Marketing Private Limited v. Resolution Professional of Mount Shivalik Industries Limited, Ms. Pratibha Khandelwal [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 180 of 2021], held that ‘Security Deposit’ and the interest thereon […]