Calcutta High Court: Application for removal of arbitrator must be made before the same court as envisaged in Sections 2(i)(e) and 42 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The Calcutta High Court (“Calcutta HC”) has, in its judgement dated August 11, 2023, in the matter of M/s. Gammon Engineers and Contractors Private Limited v. The State of West Bengal [A.P. No. 785 of 2022], held that an application for removal of an arbitrator must be made before the same ‘court’ as envisaged in […]

NCLAT: Avoidance application can continue after the completion of CIRP

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Bench (“NCLAT”), in the matter of Kapil Wadhawan v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited and Others [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) Nos. 437, 439, 441, 442, 445, 451, 452 and 512 of 2023], held that avoidance applications can continue even after completion of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”). […]

Supreme Court: Section 327(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 which excludes the application of Sections 326 and 327 of the Companies Act, 2013 to a company undergoing liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, is constitutionally valid

The Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”), vide its judgement jointly in the matter of Moser Baer Karamchari Union Through President Mahesh Chand Sharma v. Union of India and Others [Writ Petition (C) No. 421 of 2019], Manoj Kumar Nagar v. Union of India [Writ Petition (C) No. 777 of 2020], and Raj Kumar Verma […]

Calcutta High Court: Courts cannot re-appreciate the evidence or substitute its view with that of the arbitrator while considering the issue of enforcement of a foreign award

The Calcutta High Court (“Calcutta HC”) has, in its judgement dated June 23, 2023, in the matter of Jaldhi Overseas Private Limited v. Steer Overseas Private Limited [(2023) SCC OnLine Cal 1628], held that courts cannot re-appreciate the evidence or substitute its view with that of the arbitrator while considering the issue of enforcement of […]